Homesteads: The resolution to the Openspace Sim Issue

Privately, among friends and during an interview this week I’ve noted that the controversy surrounding Openspace Sim raised the need of a new product; something that was not a full sim, but not an Openspace sim.  Moments ago, M Linden has announced a resolution to the Openspace Sim controversy, Homesteads. This is a really good move for Linden Lab and community. This new product bridges the gap between Openspaces and full fledged sims. A win-win, for those those who wanted to keep cheaper sim land, Linden Lab wanting to maintain their grid stability initatives. This announcement also displays Linden Lab’s continued ability to recognizing, listening and adjusting their policies based on feedback.

As for the details, Openspaces will remain as they should, light use simulators, but will carry embedded performance restrictions and the same price of $75 a month. Homesteads will be higher light use (lets call these medium use for now as the technical details have not been released) and will include the $125 price increase over six months. I wonder if these will also include any performance restrictions.

From this decision it is obvious that Linden Lab is listening and finding ways to support the customer base. This resolution is something that helps build and maintain private large communities by filling the void between those whom wanted private homes and areas but could not afford a full priced sim; it also helps Linden Lab (I believe) achieve their goal of platform stability.

While this will be viewed as a victory for those fighting to maintain cheaper sims, I’m not sure about it’s long term effects. While there are benefits to those estate owners who have been using Openspace sims as a part of their business model, what about those who never considered them a part of their model? I also wonder about the effect Homesteads have on the mainland. While the new Homestead product is a positive, it will be some time until the full effect of this decision is demonstrated. Only time will tell, but this decision should quiet the critcs of their Opensim decision.

6 thoughts on “Homesteads: The resolution to the Openspace Sim Issue

  1. Pingback: The Openspaces Exodus Scenario (A Roadmap) |

  2. Pingback: Linden Lab Revises Planned Openspace Price Change « Around the Grid

  3. Pingback: Metaverse.TV’s MBC Openspace Roundtable Discussion | Nexeus Fatale

  4. I think i agree with the main thrust of your argument here. In my case, I do have an open sim,in the “Homestad” molud. It fulfills my desire for space while not imposing the costs associated with a full sim. I may be payimg more per prim, the advantage of privacy and space to terraform land to me and my partners needs, outweigh the ‘extra’ cost involved.

  5. I read through the many thousands of user comments and I reached a very different conclusion than you. M Linden failed to make a single post. Jack managed 4, but nine of them addressed the main issues being raised. Faced with a user revolt they responded by renaming the current OpenSpace region and staggering the price hike. Remember, this decision was made without a single warning that LL were concerned that Openspace sims were not being used as they wanted. Instead of tackling the problem, they increased the price by 67%. Far from it being obvious that LL is listening to its user base, the arrogance and incompetence they demonstrated has alienated a considerable number of paying customers. If anyone looks at the SL forum, they will quickly see that your assessment is not the view of almost everyone posting there.

  6. Pingback: Top Virtual World Topics of 2008 | Nexeus Fatale

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>